Concord E-Discovery, Scanning & Data Collection

Southern California's Finest for 25 years & counting

Request a Free Professional Consultation  (213) 745-3175
eDiscovery · Scanning · Forensic Data Collection · Online Attorney Review · Printing
Serving top law firms and corporations since 1996  
  • About Us
    • Meet Concord
    • Our Blog
    • Testimonials
  • Services
    • Deposition Officer Services
    • Records Storage
    • Financial Printing
    • Managed Services
  • E-Discovery
    • Venio On-Line Review
    • Online Review
    • Data Collection
    • ESI Calculator
  • On-Site
  • Scanning
  • Legal Copying
    • Trial Exhibit Binders
  • Records Storage
  • Contact Us

First 7 to 10 Days May Make or Break Your Case

January 22, 2015

eDiscovery Best Practices    By Doug Austin (CloudNine)

Having worked with a client recently that was looking for some guidance at the outset of their case, it seemed appropriate to revisit this topic here.

CALL CONCORD today (800) 246-7881

When a case is filed, several activities must be completed within a short period of time (often as soon as the first seven to ten days after filing) to enable you to assess the scope of the case, where the key electronically stored information (ESI) is located and whether to proceed with the case or attempt to settle with opposing counsel. Here are several of the key early activities that can assist in deciding whether to litigate or settle the case.

Activities:

  • Create List of Key Employees Most Likely to have Documents Relevant to the Litigation: To estimate the scope of the case, it’s important to begin to prepare the list of key employees that may have potentially responsive data. Information such as name, title, eMail address, phone number, office location and where information for each is stored on the network is important to be able to proceed quickly when issuing hold notices and collecting their data. Some of these employees may no longer be with your organization, so you may have to determine whether their data is still available and where.
  • Issue Litigation Hold Notice and Track Results: The duty to preserve begins when you anticipate litigation; however, if litigation could not be anticipated prior to the filing of the case, it is certainly clear once the case if filed that the duty to preserve has begun. Hold notices must be issued ASAP to all parties that may have potentially responsive data. Once the hold is issued, you need to track and follow up to ensure compliance. Here are a couple of posts from 2012 regarding issuing hold notices and tracking responses.
  • Interview Key Employees: As quickly as possible, interview key employees to identify potential locations of responsive data in their possession as well as other individuals they can identify that may also have responsive data so that those individuals can receive the hold notice and be interviewed.
  • Interview Key Department Representatives: Certain departments, such as IT, Records or Human Resources, may have specific data responsive to the case. They may also have certain processes in place for regular destruction of “expired” data, so it’s important to interview them to identify potentially responsive sources of data and stop routine destruction of data subject to litigation hold.
  • Inventory Sources and Volume of Potentially Relevant Documents: Potentially responsive data can be located in a variety of sources, including: shared servers, eMail servers, employee workstations, employee home computers, employee mobile devices, portable storage media (including CDs, DVDs and portable hard drives), active paper files, archived paper files and third-party sources (consultants and contractors, including cloud storage providers). Hopefully, the organization already has created a data map before litigation to identify the location of sources of information to facilitate that process. It’s important to get a high level sense of the total population to begin to estimate the effort required for discovery.
  • Plan Data Collection Methodology: Determining how each source of data is to be collected also affects the cost of the litigation. Are you using internal resources, outside counsel or a litigation support vendor? Will the data be collected via an automated collection system or manually? Will employees “self-collect” any of their own data? If so, important data may be missed. Answers to these questions will impact the scope and cost of not only the collection effort, but the entire discovery effort.

These activities can result in creating a data map of potentially responsive information and a “probable cost of discovery” spreadsheet (based on initial estimated scope compared to past cases at the same stage) that will help in determining whether to proceed to litigate the case or attempt to settle with the other side.

So, what do you think? How quickly do you decide whether to litigate or settle?

 
 

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: analysis, bates numbering, California, collection, data retention, ediscovery, electronic discovery, ESI, governance, identification, litigation, native production, project management

RSS Concord E-Discovery, Scanning & Data Collection

  • Avoiding Data Dumps in E-Discovery: How to Handle an Overload of Documents February 13, 2023
    From negotiating scope to relying on analytics technology, a University of Florida E-Discovery Conference panel shared some of the best practices to analyze voluminous productions. February 09, 2023 at 04:13 PM  3 minute read E-Discovery Cassandre Coyer  The volume of data that companies amass on their employees and customers alike is increasing at a staggering rate—and with […]
  • E-Discovery Managed Services: A Bridge to Predictive Analytics March 25, 2016
    When it comes to e-discovery, many firms have not integrated a fundamental analytics tool—predictive coding. Call CONCORD today! (800) 246-7881 Tania Mabrey and Monica Bay March 22, 2016 Although predictive analytics may be difficult to master, it’s a tool that can greatly improve litigation results. There’s no question that Big Data analytics are dramatically changing […]

E-Discovery Services

Document Scanning

Legal Copying

Copyright © 2023 · Enterprise Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in